New research indicates that discrimination against feminine gay men is prevalent not only among heterosexual men, but also within the gay community itself. Talk about
internalized homophobia!
This research from the University of Sydney uncovers a potent internal bias within the gay community against feminine-presenting gay men. The study reveals that both gay and heterosexual men tend to prefer masculine-presenting men for high-status roles, leading to potential workplace discrimination, particularly in hiring and promotion practices. This indicates a 'gay glass ceiling' and a need for advocacy and training efforts to challenge these biases.
Researcher Ben Gerrard conducted a unique experiment using a mock TV commercial casting brief. The results showed a strong preference for masculine-presenting actors, demonstrating the bias in a practical context. The study also found that higher levels of homonegativity and misogyny amplified this preference for masculine-presenting individuals.
Gerrard highlights the need to challenge the prevailing association between masculinity and leadership. In modern, team-based workplaces, traits traditionally considered feminine, such as warmth, empathy, and good communication, are invaluable. He suggests that these biases create pressure for feminine gay men to present as more masculine. Gerrard calls for an increase in authentic representation of empowered feminine-presenting gay men in media and a conscious effort to educate and raise awareness about these unfair biases.
New research indicates that discrimination against feminine gay men is prevalent not only among heterosexual men, but also within the gay community itself.
According to this groundbreaking study from the University of Sydney, both gay and heterosexual men seem to favor their masculine counterparts for high-status roles.
This implicit bias could potentially disadvantage feminine-presenting gay men, subjecting them to workplace discrimination, including biases in hiring practices and promotion opportunities.
This pioneering research, appearing in the renowned peer-reviewed journal 'Sex Roles', marks the first empirical study demonstrating the status penalties associated with a feminine presentation among gay men across professional hierarchies. It crucially brings to light the prevalence of internal bias within the gay community.
Researcher Ben Gerrard, an expert in gender and sexuality studies at the University of Sydney, defines feminine traits as encompassing aspects such as a more feminine vocal quality, body language, and posture.
Gerrard's study uncovers a disappointing truth: a pronounced preference among gay men for individuals presenting as more 'straight-acting' in high-status roles. This internalized bias among the gay community, he suggests, is potentially creating a 'gay glass ceiling' in workplaces.
Moreover, Gerrard points out that even as gay men increasingly achieve equality and representation in Western cultures, they continue to face challenges in pursuing high-status opportunities as compared to heterosexual men. This emphasizes the urgent need for advocacy and training efforts to combat bias against feminine-presenting gay men across professional contexts and populations.
In this fascinating experiment, Gerrard devised a fictitious casting call for a TV tourism ad. The mission? Sell Sydney overseas. The casting requirements? An actor who screams "leader" and who could charm the audience.
So, Gerrard, a professional actor himself, went ahead and filmed six of his fellow actors. Each one, a gay man in reality, performed the same script twice: once as a feminine-gay character, and once as a masculine-gay character. Everything remained identical, apart from voice, mannerisms, and posture.
Example of more feminine-presenting gay men.
Example of more masculine-presenting men.
A mixed bag of 256 gay and heterosexual men were then roped in to watch these performances. Their task? Pick out a "leader" to represent Australia. No surprises here, both gay and straight men leaned toward the more masculine-gay performance, showing clear discrimination against the feminine-gay actor.
The straight men with a higher degree of homonegativity and the gay men with a higher degree of misogyny showed an even stronger bias towards the masculine-gay actor. These trends bring into focus the role of implicit biases in hiring decisions.
It's time for a reality check, says Gerrard. We need to question our deep-seated association of masculinity with high status. Especially when modern leadership theories suggest that "feminine" traits, like warmth, are invaluable in today's collaborative workplaces.
"I Don't Want To Be Seen As a Screaming Queen!"
As Gerrard puts it, "We now operate in team-based workplaces where feminine traits such as warmth, empathy, and good communication are key. A feminine-presenting gay man could, in fact, be an ideal leader." But the problem lies in the lingering bias towards traditional masculinity in senior leadership, deeming feminine traits as too soft.
This internalized homophobic bias forces feminine gay men to put up a "straight" act to fit in. What's really needed is more authentic representation of empowered feminine-presenting gay men, especially in media.
Gerrard emphasizes the importance of education and awareness around these subconscious biases during recruitment processes. It's time we consciously worked against these unfair biases.